You are not logged in. Use your Twitter account to sign in / sign up.

PKM and Self-Management

Date & time
Tuesday, January 18, 2011 - 17:00 UTC (other timezones)
Moderated by
Share
Tags
Chat Transcript
Related Content

Literature (Dorsey, Avery et al, Frand & Hixon) suggests that self-management is an important component of Personal Knowledge Management. Akin to self-management is the concept of behavioral self-regulation: setting goals, monitoring performance, evaluating and refining approach.

What is the role of self-regulation in PKM? What is the correlation between one's ability to self-regulate and successfully practice PKM? Can the strength of one's ability to self-regulate be, in any way, a predictor of PKM success? If so, can an assessment of self-regulation be useful in assessing PKM?

 

Comments

md_santo's picture

 Within our Human System Biology-based KM (HSBKM) model framework, we developed three boundaries of KM regarding their interface with the environment. They are, KM Tools (Techno-based boundary), KM Process Framework (Human Mind-based boundary), KM Standard Culture & Value (Organizational Learning-based boundary). On these boundaries, visit K-base http://bit.ly/dSl4Vk

 Considering from our Human System Biology-based Knowledge Management (HSBKM) model framework stand point, evidence showed that KM TOOLS ( Techno tools including Social Media) which is only weighted score 1.0 as value of their “Knowledge with Lower Consciousness (KLC)”, symbolizing human senses or peripheral nerve system to develop “CORPORATE SENSES” , could be leveled up as KM PROCESS FRAMEWORK, be like as Human Tacit Mind or Individual Learning Process behaving as “CORPORATE MIND BRAIN”, with weighted score 3.0 for their value of “Knowledge with Medium Consciousness (KMC)”, symbolizing human central nerve system or mind brain only after KM Tools classified as Web 3.0 and/or Semantic Web including Artificial Intelligence (AI) as well as other advanced smart hi-tech and/or smart Decision Support System to act as human mind brain substitution

 But, within context of organizational culture and value with higher complexity environment that needs involvement of “Knowledge with Higher Consciousness (KHC)” and symbolizing our consciousness genomic DNA as “CORPORATE CONSCIOUSNESS DNA” representing as KM STANDARDS (Culture and Value) covering Codified / Explicit Knowledge, Human Social Behavior, Organizational Culture (Learning Organization) with weighted score 5.0, is not possible until recently to be substituted with techno tools whatsoever! ( Refer also to the link “WE ARE KM-REGULATED BY NATURE vice-versa BY NATURE WE ARE KM MODEL” -http://mobeeknowledge.ning.com/forum/topics/we-are-kmregulated-by-nature )

 Therefore, in practicing KM, we just put the technology factor as 3rd priority setting against human mind as 2ndpriority and organizational learning culture as 1st priority setting respectively. The weighted score for the value of techno (machine) learning only 1.0 compared to 3.0 and 5.0 for human (individual) learning and organizational learning regarding the difficulty as well as the complexity in executing them (see also http://mobeeknowledge.ning.com/forum/topics/matching-knowledge-strategy-to - “MATCHING KNOWLEDGE STRATEGY TO BUSINESS STRATEGY” )

 Derived from points of view above mentioned, by nature, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM) itself comprised of “Human (Peripheral) Senses” as “Human Primary Knowing Tools” (Knowledge with Lower Consciousness / KLC) enabled by KM Tools used, “Human Mind Brains” as Human Tacit Knowledge or “Human Secondary Knowing Tools” (Knowledge with Medium Consciousness / KMC) enabled by KM Process Framework and his/her interaction with “Human Consciousness DNA” or “Human Tertiary Knowing Tools” (Knowledge with Higher Consciousness / KHC) as Human Collective Learning as Social Behavior respectively. The last enabled by KM Standards Culture and Value

 Self regulation itself is the optimization process of the interaction among (KLC + KM Tools), (KMC + KM Process Framework) and (KHC + KM Standards Culture and Value) inside an individual human being. The strength of self regulation could be assessed by measuring the Capability, which is Process-based measurement, as well as measuring the Activity, which is Activity-based measurement respectively. Regarding this issue, we have developed our HSBKM-based KM Metric version called “Mobee Knowledge Competency and Capability Maturity” (MKCCM) model (visit http://mobeeknowledge.ning.com/forum/topics/introducing-mobee-knowledge-1 - “INTRODUCING MOBEE KNOWLEDGE COMPETENCY AND CAPABILITY MATURITY (MKCCM™) MODEL : A PRELIMINARY REPORT” ) and for case examples on the utilization of MKCCM model, visit http://mobeeknowledge.ning.com/forum/topics/applying-our-knowledge - “APPLYING OUR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT METRICS IN MEASURING BANKING RISK MANAGEMENT ACHIEVEMENT” and http://mobeeknowledge.ning.com/forum/topics/pcf-apqc-and-hskbkm-based?xg... - “PCF – APQC * AND HSKBKM ** BASED ASSESSMENT ON INFRASTRUCTURE RISK MANAGEMENT ACHIEVEMENT”

 To learn our Human System Biology-based KM (HSBKM) model framework, visit “Our KM Model Framework”http://bit.ly/cSwUlx – “KM 2.0 Basic Visual Map” http://bit.ly/bTzgUz - “Our 6 Dimensions of KM”http://bit.ly/cPadwJ and/or Human System Biology-based KM (HSBKM©) model-based Community of Practice (CoP) at the Link http://bit.ly/g3B4jo also K-base http://www.delicious.com/mobeeknowledge/humansystembiology , http://www.delicious.com/mobeeknowledge/kmtools+kmprocessframework+kmsta... )

Md Santo – http://mobeeknowledge.ning.com